Tapping, switching, pushing, and pulling: HELP!

Discussion in 'Pickups, Electronics & General Tech' started by MerlinTKD, Sep 11, 2007.

  1. MerlinTKD

    MerlinTKD EIght.Fold.Path / Hinge Theory Contributor

    Messages:
    2,329
    Likes Received:
    219
    Joined:
    May 28, 2007
    Location:
    Winston-Salem, NC
    Okay, I've done some more research... more knowledge leads to new questions :scratch:

    I've got the Duncan Designed JB/Jazz... which makes more sense:

    - replacing the existing 3-way blade switch with a 5-way/4-pole and coil-splitting each pickup;

    - replacing the existing 3-way blade switch with a 5-way/4-pole and combining outer and inner in parallel;

    - keeping the existing 3-way blade switch and replacing the tone pot with a push-pull coil-split?


    Also, what difference in sound will the first two options achieve? I'm a little confused about that.

    Finally, has anyone ordered from guitarelectronics.com, and if so, what's been your experience?

    When I order (from wherever), I'll probably replace the cheap pots I have with better ones, and a couple other accessories as well, so I'm open to suggestions about the best way to mod these pickups!

    :wavey:
     
  2. Apophis

    Apophis Banned

    Messages:
    15,981
    Likes Received:
    891
    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2005
    Location:
    Poland
    I suggest keeping the existing 3-way blade switch and replacing the tone pot with a push-pull coil-split. This comfig will give us much more possibilities :)
     
  3. Leon

    Leon {##[====:::. Contributor

    Messages:
    13,717
    Likes Received:
    1,041
    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2004
    Location:
    Nebula, Ohio
  4. MerlinTKD

    MerlinTKD EIght.Fold.Path / Hinge Theory Contributor

    Messages:
    2,329
    Likes Received:
    219
    Joined:
    May 28, 2007
    Location:
    Winston-Salem, NC
    Good God, Leon... that's a LOT of options off a 3-way switch! :eek:

    After the shock fades, the possibilities begin... hmmm... :D Thanks for the replies! I'll probably replace the switch anyway (cheap electronics in this guitar!), but 3-way/push-pull pot(s) seem the way to go!

    Thanks! :yesway:
     
  5. scott from _actual time_

    scott from _actual time_ grumpy old man Contributor

    Messages:
    1,054
    Likes Received:
    140
    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2005
    Location:
    Virginia, USA
    with the 5-way, you could do _both_ of those in the same setup.
    1 - neck, full
    2 - neck, coil split
    3 - two inner coils
    4 - bridge, coil split
    5 - bridge, full

    i always prefer 5-way switches because they give you many more possible combinations. then i use push/pulls to switch the entire 5-way into a different "mode" with new combinations. for example, you could do positions 2-4 above with the inner coils, then have a push/pull change those positions to use the outer coils.

    here is my H/S/H switching scheme, with push/pull down, then up.
    [​IMG].[​IMG]
     
    MerlinTKD likes this.
  6. stubhead

    stubhead Feral Buddha

    Messages:
    410
    Likes Received:
    62
    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2007
    Location:
    MD Eastern Shore
    I find the series/parallel switching to be somewhat more practical than a straight coil tap. A coil tap instantly cuts your output in half; the series-to-parallel drops it a little bit, but it gives you back a lot of the highs that the standard series-wired humbucker "steals", as compared to a single coil. If you're going to drop off one coil from a humbucker, it helps to start with a pretty high-powered one to begin with.
     
  7. MerlinTKD

    MerlinTKD EIght.Fold.Path / Hinge Theory Contributor

    Messages:
    2,329
    Likes Received:
    219
    Joined:
    May 28, 2007
    Location:
    Winston-Salem, NC
    [action=Merlin]'s head explodes[/action] :flame:

    Wow.

    I'm gonna have to sit and think about this for... ever? :lol:

    But wow, thanks for all the input!! :yesway:



    Edit: Wed Sept 12
    Okay, been thinking... is it possible to wire this on a 5-way switch?

    1 - Neck, series
    2 - Neck, parallel
    3 - Inner coils, series
    4 - Bridge, parallel
    5 - Bridge, series

    Is that possible? If so, I think that's what I'm really looking for... and then maybe add the push-pull for splitting, like so:

    1 - Neck, split
    2 - North coils, parallel
    3 - Outer coils, parallel
    4 - South coils, parallel
    5 - Bridge, split

    Or something like that, I dunno. Any other opinions?
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.