Somebody Stop Me ... The new Dave Davidson's are out.

nightflameauto

Well-Known Member
Joined
Sep 25, 2010
Messages
3,407
Reaction score
4,473
Location
Sioux Falls, SD
After kicking it around, every guitar with a Floyd I ever buy ends up being gotten rid of soon after. But I'm gonna hold out hope that at some point there's a "good" warrior in that yellow scheme with a hardtail. That's the only part of those I'm not in love with, aside from the reverse stock on the red one.
 

Edika

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 12, 2010
Messages
6,124
Reaction score
4,145
Location
Londonderry, N.Ireland, UK
Two MII Jacksons I got lately had issues. One was from a store and went back, the other I got cheap that I can fix. I love these two and I want a 7 string Warrior, as the one that went back was the mahogany color DD WR7, but if I'm going to be paying that much new, I don't want to take a gamble. The one I got was awesome in all aspects other the fact the Floyd had to be over the trem cavity for strings not to choke. I'm not sure how low the frets had to be ground ro get it to play well but I don't think they would still be jumbo frets!
 

Neon_Knight_

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2012
Messages
2,196
Reaction score
2,462
Location
England
Oh yeah, I know. Everything is about to get more expensive. I was just making a point about Indonesia having 32% tariffs. But yeah, sucks to be in this economy right now...Buy now or never again.
I wasn't trying to correct you, so I hope it didn't come across that way. It's just going to really suck for any Americans wanting to buy a new guitar! (EDIT: and for any American guitar dealers)
 

Edika

Well-Known Member
Joined
Mar 12, 2010
Messages
6,124
Reaction score
4,145
Location
Londonderry, N.Ireland, UK
Do the tarrifs apply for products or companies? Meaning the guitars are manufactured in Indonesia but will be sold by an American (?) company worldwide. I don't know if they'll be shipped at Jackson warehouses in the US or other countries or shipped direct to dealers from the factory on behalf of Jackson and how tarrifs will apply.

Edit: I'm mentioning this as the company I work for manufactures components all over the world and the US for the products we sell, final product is assembled in China, the headquarters have moved in a country with lower taxes and they've supposedly have taken the tariff into account as they don't want to raise the prices too much and affect the operation of factories. But it started as a US company.
 

somethingsomething

SS.org Regular
Joined
Sep 23, 2021
Messages
653
Reaction score
1,546
Do the tarrifs apply for products or companies? Meaning the guitars are manufactured in Indonesia but will be sold by an American (?) company worldwide. I don't know if they'll be shipped at Jackson warehouses in the US or other countries or shipped direct to dealers from the factory on behalf of Jackson and how tarrifs will apply.

Edit: I'm mentioning this as the company I work for manufactures components all over the world and the US for the products we sell, final product is assembled in China, the headquarters have moved in a country with lower taxes and they've supposedly have taken the tariff into account as they don't want to raise the prices too much and affect the operation of factories. But it started as a US company.

It has nothing to do with where the company selling the product is headquartered. It's based on where the goods are coming from. So, if the product is made in Indonesia but sold by an American company (in this case FMIC), then a tariff will apply when the product enters the US (assuming it isn't exempt, but as far as I know, these are blanket tariffs and musical instruments aren't exempt).
 

Neon_Knight_

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2012
Messages
2,196
Reaction score
2,462
Location
England
Do the tarrifs apply for products or companies? Meaning the guitars are manufactured in Indonesia but will be sold by an American (?) company worldwide. I don't know if they'll be shipped at Jackson warehouses in the US or other countries or shipped direct to dealers from the factory on behalf of Jackson and how tarrifs will apply.

Edit: I'm mentioning this as the company I work for manufactures components all over the world and the US for the products we sell, final product is assembled in China, the headquarters have moved in a country with lower taxes and they've supposedly have taken the tariff into account as they don't want to raise the prices too much and affect the operation of factories. But it started as a US company.
When a part / material / product is imported into America, the company importing it has to pay a tariff on it.

The tariff is a % of the value at the time of import, not at the point of sale by the American company. If the American company imports a product (or parts / materials for the product) and then sells a product to the country that it was previously imported from (i.e. exports it back), the American company has already paid the tariff at the point of import and cannot claim it back.

It is essentially an additional tax that the US company has to either swallow or pass on to its customers (or a combination of the two).

For example:
Pre-tarrifs, Guitar Center imports a set of Gotoh locking tuners from Japan, paying a hypothetical $40 and then reselling them for a hypothetical $80. Guitar Center pays $0 tariffs and makes $40 profit (100% profit margin).
Post-tariffs, Guitar Center pays a 24% tariff on the $40 cost (i.e. $9.60) when importing the tuners from Japan, so now pays a total of $49.60 instead of $40. Gotoh receives the same $40 and pays $0 tariffs. If Guitar Centre still selss the tuners for $80, their profit is only $30.40 (61% profit margin).
If Guitar Center wants to make the same $40 profit per sale, they need to charge their American customer $89.60 instead of $80 (i.e. 12% more).
If Guitar Center wants to maintain the same 100% profit margin, they need to charge their American customer $99.20 instead of $80 (i.e. 24% more).
If Guitar Center moves its HQ to Japan, it still needs to import the tuners from Japan into America, which incurs the 24% tariff on the $40 tuner price in order to get them onto US soil...before it can sell them to a US customer.
If Guitar Center moves its HQ and operations to Japan, the 24% tariff will apply to the $80 retail price that the customer pays, not to the $40 price that Guitar Center pays to Gotoh...meaning the American customer or supplier has to swallow a $19.20 tariff, not a $9.60 tariff.

The only way for Guitar Center to avoid the a tariff on tuners is to buy them from an American manufacturer - which is what Trump is hoping they will do.
In the first instance, American manufacturers would not be able to meet the demand nor match Gotoh's price.
If American manufacturers increase their production to meet the demand, they still won't be able to match Gotoh's price, due to US labour costs. Let's assume hypothetically that it would cost $50 to purchase a set of tuners from a US manufacturer (i.e. $0.40 more expensive than continuing to import Japanese tuners from Gotoh). We then need to factor in that the US manufacturer might not be a household name, so consumers might not want to buy it (resulting in a drop of sales if Guitar Center stocks the US tuners instead of the Gotoh tuners).
If Guitar Center tasks a US manufacturer with matching / beating Gotoh's price, the manufacturer can potentially only achieve that by lowering their quality (i.e. cheaper materials, cheaper tools, less experienced labour, reduced quality control measures etc.). Now Guitar Center is stocking a product that can be sold for the same profit margin (hurray!), but is inferior quality to Gotoh (boo!) and not a brand name that consumers want (boo!).

Now put all of this into the context of an established US brand whose profit margins and share prices are massively reliant on cheap Chinese labour and cheap Chinese parts & materials. The difference in labour costs (in many cases literally subsided by the use of Uighur forced labour currently) is too huge for it to be viable for a company to simply move manufacturing to US soil and keep prices + profit margins the same.
Apple and its shareholders must be fuming / crying right now.

It seems like a lose / lose situation all around, which is why almost everyone is at a complete loss as to how Trump (or his cult-like supporters) could possibly think this will benefit Americans.

Last time the US jacked up tariffs and started a trade war, The Great Depression quickly followed. Then, when the US started to reduce its tariffs, both the US and the global economies experienced an upturn. Not many people consider this to be a coincidence.
The speculative boom of the 1920s is largely attributed as the cause of the Wall Street Crash and a boom will always be followed by some degree of recession...it's just a matter of when and how severe.
However, the US and global economies were still on an upwards trajectory in early 1929, when the US started jacking up tariffs (in May 1929). Prices increased and sales decreased. The Wall Street Crash and The Great Depression soon followed.
Then the Smoot–Hawley Tariff Act (a Republican bill) was passed in 1930, against the advice of senior US economists, which resulted in the introduction of bigger and wider-ranging tariffs. Prices further increased and sales further decreased. The Great Depression significantly worsened.
Then the Democrats came into power and started to lower US tariffs. This was soon followed by an economic upturn and the end of The Graet Depression.
Can all (or any) of this be coincidental?
🤔

Let's not forget what followed The Great Depression...World War II. Massive US tariffs, global recession, governments blaming immigrants etc...the same warning signs are there. 🥺
 

Neon_Knight_

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2012
Messages
2,196
Reaction score
2,462
Location
England
It has nothing to do with where the company selling the product is headquartered. It's based on where the goods are coming from. So, if the product is made in Indonesia but sold by an American company (in this case FMIC), then a tariff will apply when the product enters the US (assuming it isn't exempt, but as far as I know, these are blanket tariffs and musical instruments aren't exempt).
I started typing my (far less concise 😅 ) reply before you posted this.
 

Neon_Knight_

Well-Known Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2012
Messages
2,196
Reaction score
2,462
Location
England
Jackson Pro Series QC is abysmal. I'll never buy another one
Any idea how Jackson chooses what to sell under the "Pro Series" banner?

What would be the equivalent line from a brand like Ibanez or Schecter?

Most guitar brands have a consistent country of manufacture for each series / line, to fall within a given price bracket, with manufacturing quality / QC to (at least theoretically) match that price bracket. However, it seems the Jackson Pro Series randomly jumps around US, Mexico, Japan, Indonesia & China. The only logical reason I can think of for this is they want to trick people into thinking they're getting a higher-end guitar than they actually are (even though Jackson is simultaneously risking people conflating poor Chinese QC with poor US Jackson QC, which would hurt the brand and its US models).
 

Captain Shoggoth

Gotoh 1996T shill
Joined
Feb 8, 2011
Messages
1,708
Reaction score
1,367
Location
Leeds, UK
His previous sigs haven't rocked my world but the yellow one is awesome. If I could afford to buy more guitars this year it'd be 2nd or 3rd in line
 

NoodleFace

Delicious Noodles
Joined
Jul 20, 2007
Messages
2,349
Reaction score
3,962
Location
Somerset, MA
Any idea how Jackson chooses what to sell under the "Pro Series" banner?

What would be the equivalent line from a brand like Ibanez or Schecter?

Most guitar brands have a consistent country of manufacture for each series / line, to fall within a given price bracket, with manufacturing quality / QC to (at least theoretically) match that price bracket. However, it seems the Jackson Pro Series randomly jumps around US, Mexico, Japan, Indonesia & China. The only logical reason I can think of for this is they want to trick people into thinking they're getting a higher-end guitar than they actually are (even though Jackson is simultaneously risking people conflating poor Chinese QC with poor US Jackson QC, which would hurt the brand and its US models).
No idea really. The ones I had were MII though.
 

jrn1308

SS.org Regular
Joined
Oct 13, 2021
Messages
114
Reaction score
470
Any idea how Jackson chooses what to sell under the "Pro Series" banner?

What would be the equivalent line from a brand like Ibanez or Schecter?

Most guitar brands have a consistent country of manufacture for each series / line, to fall within a given price bracket, with manufacturing quality / QC to (at least theoretically) match that price bracket. However, it seems the Jackson Pro Series randomly jumps around US, Mexico, Japan, Indonesia & China. The only logical reason I can think of for this is they want to trick people into thinking they're getting a higher-end guitar than they actually are (even though Jackson is simultaneously risking people conflating poor Chinese QC with poor US Jackson QC, which would hurt the brand and its US models).

I don't think any Pro Series is made in the US or Japan. US is the American Series, USA Select and Custom Shop. Japan is the MJ Series.

The biggest bunch of the Pro Series seems to be made in Indonesia. There are also some made in China and Korea. As I understand Pro Series are "high end" specs like Floyd Rose 1000 instead of special, Graph Tech Nuts, Seymour Duncan Pickups, Ebony fretboard, locking tuners (depending on the model).
Then there's also the Pro Plus Series that is basically the same as the Pro Series but the have stainless steel frets... usually made in China, some models made in Indonesia.
 
Top
')