/wrists
enthusiast
- Joined
- Apr 2, 2021
- Messages
- 1,205
- Reaction score
- 766
I'm curious what SSO thinks.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Randy_Blythe_manslaughter_case
I remember this being a headline when I was in high school or so...
I know he's technically not guilty, but at the same time it seems like he most definitely pushed someone off the stage.
I didn't really follow the case back then, I'm not sure if anyone even remembers this.
Weak sauce and convoluted. Either he's guilty, and he's responsible from a criminal and moral perspective, or he's not guilty, and he's not responsible for either perspectives.
Thoughts?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Randy_Blythe_manslaughter_case
I remember this being a headline when I was in high school or so...
I know he's technically not guilty, but at the same time it seems like he most definitely pushed someone off the stage.
I didn't really follow the case back then, I'm not sure if anyone even remembers this.
On March 5, 2013, the court delivered a verdict, according to which Blythe was not criminally liable for Nosek's death, even though he had the moral responsibility for it. Consequently, the court dismissed the damages claim and ordered the return of Blythe's bail.[6]
The court held that it was proven that Blythe had thrown Nosek off the stage. However, Blythe, due to his nearsightedness, could have mistaken Nosek for the other fan who had repeatedly gotten over the guardrail. According to the court, the largest part of the blame lies with the promoters and security members. Judge Kubovec further reproached Blythe for not having met with the Nosek family.[6]
The State Attorney announced that he would appeal the verdict
Weak sauce and convoluted. Either he's guilty, and he's responsible from a criminal and moral perspective, or he's not guilty, and he's not responsible for either perspectives.
Thoughts?